Other Possible Engagement Contributions

3.3.2 A description of your contributions to your team’s research, oral presentation

preparation and proposal writing

Throughout the course of our project, I made several contributions to our team’s research, proposal writing, and oral presentation preparation. In the early stages, I proposed the idea of a smart traffic light/congestion predictor using AI and real-time data, which I believed could be a valuable solution for urban traffic management. Although our team ultimately chose to develop an integrated timetable software, I played an active role in refining this idea by identifying key gaps and helping set clear objectives. I also offered insights into the limitations of the current timetable system and suggested making the software multi-platform to increase its accessibility and user base.

As we moved into the research and proposal writing phases, I focused on gathering relevant data. I conducted a survey among SIT students to identify the issues they face with the current timetable system, ensuring that our solution was rooted in real user needs. I also took the lead in researching SIT’s core values and its IT infrastructure to align our project with the institution's priorities. During the writing process, I contributed to the literature review, writing and refining the introduction to provide a clear context and rationale for our project. I also made sure to incorporate feedback to improve clarity and coherence in the final draft.

In terms of proposal writing, I suggested including an overview of existing platforms such as Notion and aSc to give context to our solution and highlight the necessity for a new tech approach. I helped review and refine content to ensure that our explanations were concise and clearly related to the goals of our project. Furthermore, I took responsibility for standardizing the report’s formatting, ensuring consistency and professionalism in its presentation. I also revised the introduction to improve the flow and readability of the document, restructuring paragraphs and refining transitions where needed.

For the oral presentation, I actively participated in pitching our idea, focusing on making the concept clear, engaging, and easy to understand for both students and faculty. I worked with my teammates to ensure that our vision was communicated effectively and that our presentation addressed the key benefits and functionalities of the timetable app. Throughout the process, I sought to provide constructive feedback and maintain open communication, ensuring that our work reflected a cohesive and professional effort.

3.3.3 A written explanation of your expected participation mark and a rationale or

justification for that expectation 

I believe my participation mark should be on the higher end of the rubric; perhaps a good but not an excellent. Looking back on my participation during in-class activities, i feel like i could have done more. I have definitely stepped out of my comfort zone by even speaking up in class but more can definitely be done. I have been punctual in meeting assignment deadlines, and I ensure that the work I submit is thoughtful and complete.

In class, I actively participate in the Professor Brad's group activities by asking relevant questions and offering well-considered comments during discussions. I make the effort to contribute meaningfully during group work and class exercises, often taking the initiative to support my team during collaborative writing or brainstorming tasks.  

My attendance has remained 100%. I have made it a point to be fully present and engaged during lessons. I listen actively, show respect to others, and aim to contribute to a positive classroom environment.

Overall, I am committed to improving and take my learning seriously, which is reflected in my consistent effort and participation in class.

3.3.5 Responding to questions related to course materials and your own study and

research project materials.

During our presentation, I addressed a question regarding aSc timetables' integration. I explained why aSc timetables could not integrate into our schools system. This is because aSc does not offer the file format needed for in4sit's input.

In class discussions, particularly when we explored examples of effective user-centered design, I actively contributed by sharing my perspectives and giving feedback to my peers. These exchanges encouraged me to think more critically about the principles behind our design decisions and deepened my understanding of what makes a system truly user-friendly.

I also had opportunities to respond to questions from my peers about our project prior to the presentation. Some were curious about how our proposed features would be implemented or how our design compared to existing tools. I answered their questions by referring to specific parts of our proposal and explaining the reasoning behind our choices. These interactions helped reinforce my understanding of our project and allowed me to practice explaining technical ideas clearly and confidently.